A Kenyan Non-governmental organisation has gone to court to contest the enactment into law the Biosafety Bill 2007 meant to regulate activities of genetically modified foods (GMOs) in the country.
The NGOn contests that genetically modified foods would have health effects on the people and the country should not be allowed to pass into the law the Biosafety Bill 2007.
Africa Nature Stream, together with a group of 13 people have opposed the Bill Published by the Minister for Science and Technology Dr Noah Wekesa for enactment as an Act of Parliament to regulate the activities of modified organisms and further establish the National Biosafety Authority.
The production, sale and trade of genetically modified organisms and food remains controversial issue across the world owing to the risk they pose to human and animal health, environmental concerns, cultural and religious consideration” they say in their suit papers.
The petitioners aver that the GMOs have been known to cause various diseases which include Cancer, cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Chronic Fatigue, mental disorder among other diseases.
It is the contention of the applicants that the GMOs seed are unnatural, laboratory made and modified which consists of combined genes of different species that include animal and human genes combined together scientifically to produce the seed.
The applicants have submitted to the court that GMOs are patented and registered and owned for marketing by multinational companies who distribute them to the world market while knowing the health hazard they pose to both human and animals.
The applicants’ lawyer Kibe Mungai has argued that countries like USA, European Union, Canada, Japan, Russia, and Asia farmers have refused to plant the seeds and even consume food stemming from the GMOs.
Insurance companies all over the world have also rejected to issue insurance cover to GMOs trade, farming, consumption and transporting anything to do with plants or seeds that are genetically modified.
It is the applicants’ case that poor Africa and Asian nations who have no capacity to assess the risk of GMOs have been turned by Americans corporations into frontiers for production and sale of GMOs seeds.
In Kenya, the Ministry of Agriculture has been turned by the multinational companies to use government institution such as Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), local Universities and Kenya Seed Company to illegally distribute GMOs seed to farmers who are unaware of the risks and environmental hazard.
Mungai argued that the multinational corporations have implored the third world countries to embrace GMOs and while the citizen from Western states are being encouraged to consume natural and organic foods, thus making the market of such foods very lucrative and is on the rise.
“The Biosafety Bill 2007 is merely a smokes screen because even before it is enacted KARI, KEPHIS and other government agencies are distributing GMO foods, seeds and crops without laboratory test reports from respective countries and owners of the said foods and crops without disclosure or details about the combination of the genes used to produce each relevant crop” the applicants argue.
The applicants aver that they will be demonstrating during the hearing of the application inter parties, that Kenya has no facilities to detect and screen GMO Maize, Wheat, and Plants and Seeds when consignments are off-loaded at the port of Mombasa.
The government has no authority to prescribe food preferences to Kenyans which will interfere with their human rights by forcing them to use GMOs seeds and crops without their approval, saying that the action is criminal and unconstitutional and a violation being committed against 34 million people living across the country.
The Bill is now on second reading in Parliament and a cross section of MPs are determined to have it passed and thus grant GMOs stakeholders and other vested interests an opportunity to market and sale the seeds and crops to innocent citizens.
The presiding court has also pointed out that the application by the Non governmental organisation indeed raises very serious constitutional matters which would be determined and will serve as test case.
Source: Africa Science News Service
by John Osoro
05 February 2008